Peer+Evaluation



Peer Evaluation
 Name of student evaluating: Ariela St-Pierre-Collins Name of student evaluated:Isabella Forsberg The quality of this wiki-tech is: Very organized indeed! :) Excellent tool and rules, and a very good job over all! What can my classmate do to improve the quality of his/her final product? My only concern is that it is slightly unfinished, but other than that I am very proud of you Izzy! :D

Self Evaluation
The quality of my wiki-tech is: I think my wiki is ok quality, but it is unfinished. Other than missing the What can I do to improve the quality of my final product? 


 * Criterion/ significance || Level 0 || Level 1-2 || Level 3-4 || Level 5-6 ||
 * D: create || The wiki-tech was not created. || The wiki-tech was created but is not complete; it is not organized, contains many grammatical errors and It does not contain reflective thinking || <span style="display: block; margin-bottom: 10pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in; text-align: center;">The wiki-tech is complete; it contains reflective thinking; it is organized but contains grammatical errors || <span style="color: #000000; display: block; margin-bottom: 10pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-top: 0in; text-align: center;">The wiki-tech is complete; it contains reflective thinking; is organized and contains minimal or no grammatical errors. ||